Paper
LLMs & Texto
Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in Large Language Model Finetuning
Fine-tuning LLMs to inject new knowledge faces a critical challenge: LLMs can quickly memorize new facts, yet fail to use them for downstream reasoning tasks.
Hugging Face · Daily Papers
·Lu Dai, Ziyang Rao
·
·▲ 6 upvotes
Este artigo está em destaque na seleção diária de papers do Hugging Face, curada pela comunidade de pesquisa em IA.
Autores: Lu Dai, Ziyang Rao, Yili Wang, Hanqing Wang, Hao Liu, Hui Xiong
- 6 upvotes da comunidade
Resumo
Resumo original (em inglês), extraído do paper:
Fine-tuning LLMs to inject new knowledge faces a critical challenge: LLMs can quickly memorize new facts, yet fail to use them for downstream reasoning tasks. We formalize this failure as the \textbf{Knowing--Using Gap}, characterized by an accuracy gap and a temporal lag between memorization and generalization. To understand this phenomenon, we fine-tune LLMs with unseen knowledge and monitor the spatial permeation dynamics of the knowledge internally using a novel intervention technique called self-patching. Self-patching identifies activation locations where relocating representations substantially improves failed generalization cases. These results are consistent with a knowledge-circuit misalignment hypothesis: memorized representations can exist internally but may not be routed to computation-effective layers. To demonstrate the practicality of this diagnostic finding, we design a simple heuristic strategy which recovers 58--75\% of the oracle headroom in generalization failure. Experiments are done cross-domain for the robustness of this finding.Onde ler
// relacionados
Leia também
Blog
As alegações mais escandalosas no processo da Apple contra a OpenAI por segredos comerciais
Blog
O que a mais recente descoberta em IA da Anthropic mostra — e o que não mostra
Blog
Novo guia de prompts da OpenAI diz aos usuários para parar de complicar e começar pelo resultado
Blog