Beyond Entropy: Correctness-Aware Advantage Shaping via Contrastive Policy Optimization

Beyond Entropy: Correctness-Aware Advantage Shaping via Contrastive Policy Optimization

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly uses entropy for advantage shaping.

Hugging Face · Daily Papers ·Weiwen Xu, Jia Liu · ·▲ 5 upvotes

Este artigo está em destaque na seleção diária de papers do Hugging Face, curada pela comunidade de pesquisa em IA.

Autores: Weiwen Xu, Jia Liu, Hou Pong Chan, Long Li, Deng Cai, Min Chen

  • 5 upvotes da comunidade

Resumo

Resumo original (em inglês), extraído do paper:

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly uses entropy for advantage shaping. However, entropy cannot distinguish useful uncertainty from detrimental confusion, limiting its effectiveness as a correctness signal. We propose Contrastive Policy Optimization (CPO), which uses token-level contrastive disagreement between reference-guided and vanilla generation distributions for correctness-aware advantage shaping. Both theoretical and empirical results show that this disagreement reliably indicates token-level correctness. We further show that On-policy Distillation is a special case of CPO, where the posterior distribution is instantiated by an external teacher model. CPO also resolves the zero-advantage problem. Experiments on in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks demonstrate that CPO substantially outperforms entropy-based RLVR methods while maintaining strong generalization. Further analysis shows that correct and incorrect responses naturally support exploration and exploitation respectively, and balancing both leads to the best performance.

Onde ler

compartilhar: