Beyond Entropy: Correctness-Aware Advantage Shaping via Contrastive Policy Optimization
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly uses entropy for advantage shaping.
Hugging Face · Daily Papers
·Weiwen Xu, Jia Liu
·
·▲ 5 upvotes
Este artigo está em destaque na seleção diária de papers do Hugging Face, curada pela comunidade de pesquisa em IA.
Autores: Weiwen Xu, Jia Liu, Hou Pong Chan, Long Li, Deng Cai, Min Chen
- 5 upvotes da comunidade
Resumo
Resumo original (em inglês), extraído do paper:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly uses entropy for advantage shaping. However, entropy cannot distinguish useful uncertainty from detrimental confusion, limiting its effectiveness as a correctness signal. We propose Contrastive Policy Optimization (CPO), which uses token-level contrastive disagreement between reference-guided and vanilla generation distributions for correctness-aware advantage shaping. Both theoretical and empirical results show that this disagreement reliably indicates token-level correctness. We further show that On-policy Distillation is a special case of CPO, where the posterior distribution is instantiated by an external teacher model. CPO also resolves the zero-advantage problem. Experiments on in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks demonstrate that CPO substantially outperforms entropy-based RLVR methods while maintaining strong generalization. Further analysis shows that correct and incorrect responses naturally support exploration and exploitation respectively, and balancing both leads to the best performance.Onde ler
// relacionados
Leia também
Blog
Hugging Face says an AI agent hacked its infrastructure, and it used AI to fight back
Blog
Beyond grep: The case for a context-rich AI coding harness
Blog
Bristol Myers Squibb Building Life Science Industry’s Most Advanced AI Factory on NVIDIA Vera Rubin
Editorial